Contents



Overview.

1.0 Introduction.
1.1 Britain in Bloom.
1.2 The areas of Ancoats and Miles Platting.
1.3 Regeneration of Ancoats and Miles Platting.
1.4 Manchester Environmental Resource Centre initiative(MERCi).
1.5 Britain in Bloom comes to East Manchester.
2.0 The Project.
2.1 How Ancoats & Miles Platting in Bloom came about.
2.2 Aims.
2.3 Fitting the Britain in Bloom bill.
2.4 Guiding principles.
2.5 Delivering the project.
3.0 Community involvement.
3.1 Consultation.
3.2 Workshops & activities:
- Eco crazy golf.
- Reclaimed street furniture.
3.3 Events:
- Window Boxes and Hanging Baskets.
- Blooming Balconies.
- Garden Market & Garden Competition.
3.4 Judging Day.
3.5 Celebrating successes.
4.0 Partnerships.
4.1 Who was involved?
4.2 A shared experience.
5.0 Gauging impact.
5.1 Improvements and recommendations.

5.2 Ideas for development.
6.0 Resources.
7.0 Appendices.
7.1 Ancoats and Miles Platting – economic and social statistics.
7.2 Blooming Edibles.
7.3 Scoring criteria for Britain in Bloom competition.
7.4 Diary of events.
7.5 Benefits of community gardens.
7.6 Concerns about Glysophate weedkiller.
7.7 Why peat-free compost?
7.8 Crazy Golf course workshop materials.
7.9 Examples of leaflets.
7.10 City Council Press Releases.



Overview.



 Manchester Environmental Resource Centre initiative (MERCi for short and fondly known as ‘Murky’) is a charity that started in 1996 and has now established Bridge-5 Mill - a Centre for Sustainable Living on the Ashton Canal in Ancoats. Our aim is to work with and support individuals and groups to make their communities and Manchester as a whole more sustainable – by this we mean greener, safer, healthier and more equitable.

 To this end, we got talking to some local residents about entering the neighbourhoods of Ancoats and Miles Platting into the Britain in Bloom competition. After seven months of frantic preparation and numerous community events the Britain in Bloom judges descended on East Manchester in July 2001 to gauge our work.

 In October of that year we learnt that we had won the North West’s Urban Regeneration Category - a new category created to acknowledge the hard work local residents had put into this under-resourced area to make it cleaner, greener, and safer.

 In the Spring of 2002, MERCi secured funds to write a report on our ‘In Bloom’ experience. We felt many valuable lessons had been learnt over the year working with local community groups, individuals, the voluntary sector and ultimately with Manchester City Council and the local regeneration agencies.

 Working closely with the communities of Ancoats and Miles Platting we learnt much about both community empowerment and the workings of the local authority. Local people never failed to impress others with their history, pride, motivation as well as skills, ingenuity and ‘contacts’. Whilst individuals within the City Council’s Operational Services, Parks Department and Housing Departments fighting vigorously against institutionalised boredom, held our hands and taught us the tricks needed to get things done.

 We felt that such a report would be valuable to communities entering the Britain in Bloom competition in the future, and for those undertaking community greening projects or simply liaising with their local authority and other statutory bodies.

 We also hope it will be useful to statutory bodies who are interested in supporting community-led projects, to learn from tried and tested methods of collaboration.

 This report is simply the story of our involvement with the people of Ancoats and Miles Platting in activities to brighten up their neighbourhood, have fun and wrestle some degree of control back for their communities.

 Like this report, Ancoats and Miles Platting in Bloom 2001 would not have been possible without the involvement of over forty residents and tenants groups, community and youth groups and schools, as well as countless individuals. This report is a tribute to them, all the enthusiastic people of Ancoats and Miles Platting and MERCi’s many volunteers.

Chris Walsh - MERCi Chairperson




1.0 Introduction.


1.1 Britain in Bloom.

Manchester City Council has been entering defined areas of the city into the Britain in Bloom competition for many years. Previous entrants have
included the communities of Blackley and Northenden as well as the city centre. The motivations have been both to involve residents and businesses in brightening up the city and to counter the past perception of the city as dirty and litter-strewn.

Britain in Bloom is run by the Royal Horticultural Society, (RHS)and is an annual competition for communities across Britain to improve their area through gardening.


Their website explains:
“ Since it started back in 1963, Britain in Bloom has grown into the biggest horticultural campaign in Europe. Every year, hundreds of communities are involved, from tiny rural villages to the largest cities, all bringing a great deal of horticultural skill and huge enthusiasm to one common aim: to regenerate local environments, both locally and nationally, by the imaginative planting of trees and shrubs, flowers and landscaping and by dealing with local environmental issues, such as: litter, graffiti and vandalism.”
Britain in Bloom informs and inspires gardeners at every level, and involves many thousands of people in so many different communities across the UK taking an active interest in caring for their local environment.
href="http://www.rhs.org.uk/britaininbloom/index.asp">

The website goes on to state:
“Britain in Bloom informs and inspires gardeners at every level, and involves many thousands of people in so many different communities across the UK taking an active interest in caring for their local environment.”

The benefits of Britain in Bloom.

The RHS states on its web site that participating communities have seen many beneficial results including:
  • An increase in civic pride through local people taking on the planning and management of their local environment.
  • Long-term improvement in their local environment through planting, floral displays and high levels of cleanliness.
  • A boost to the local economy through increased tourism.
  • Regeneration of disadvantaged areas.
  • Stimulation of voluntary work and co-operation between community groups.
  • A means to address issues such as sustainability, recycling, minimising waste and energy conservation.
The competition.

The judging of a designated area (which can be defined by the community – but sanctioned by the local authority and in our case the local regeneration agency East Side) is judged over a number of hours. The Judges have strict guidelines to follow and allocate marks in the following categories:

   Floral displays (30%)
   Permanent landscaping (25%)
   Local Agenda 21 and sustainable development  (15%)
   Local environmental quality (20%)
   Public awareness (10%)

The RHS web site also states that:
“There is also an emphasis on the importance of getting the whole community involved. Co-operation between local authority, business and the commercial sector, the private sector, voluntary groups and individuals is vital.”

1.2 The areas of Ancoats and Miles Platting.

Ancoats and Miles Platting lie just to the North East of the city centre across the Great Ancoats Road. Ancoats is the cradle of the industrial revolution and the area was home to heavy industry until relatively recently including coal mining, gas production and other chemical processes.

Today the communities of Ancoats and Miles Platting are very under-resourced. Changes in industrial practices and the flight of people from the inner cities has left the area one of the poorest in Britain.

Ancoats and Miles Platting’s dwindling population is characterised by a higher proportion of young and retired people but fewer of working age compared to Manchester. As a whole those who are of working age are typically low earners and many are unemployed and in receipt of benefits. The current unemployment rate is more than double the Greater Manchester and national average.

As a result, residents of Ancoats and Miles Platting suffer from poor health. The area has earlier death rates than Manchester which itself has rates far in excess of the national average. Death from lung cancer is twice the national average and respiratory disease is well above the national average. A majority of under 5’s suffers from dental disease, and the area has one of the highest pre-16 conception rates in the country.


Such official statistics paint a bleak picture of the two communities but it is an area not very different from other inner city areas. Within such statistics are many people who are committed to living there and improving the area. Many local people feel passionately and adamantly that their community has many benefits and has the strength and potential to better itself.


1.3 Regeneration of Ancoats and Miles Platting.


After many years of neglect Ancoats and Miles Platting is now the focus for a huge regeneration programme. Building on the financial investment of Sports City (the stadium built for the 2002 Common Wealth Games) half a mile away the area is undergoing a large rebuilding programme.

The property developer Urban Splash is building a Millenium Village to be called New Islington on the old Cardroom Eastate and the site of the derelict Ancoats Hospital. Miles Platting council housing stock is being renovated through a Public Finance Initiative, European Union and Single Regeneration Budget funds are being used to improve the infrastructure of the area.

Initially funds went to improve transport links including renovating the Ashton and Rochdale Canals. CCTV surveillance has been installed on many of the streets and street
lighting, pathways and signage have all been improved in this early stage of the regeneration.

With plans to greatly increase the numbers of people living in the area over the coming years, local people are fighting to retain some degree of historic context and control over the regeneration.

Put simply it is a critical time for these communities – it is vitally important that community-focused and ultimately community controlled projects succeed.


1.4 Manchester Environmental Resource Centre initiative.


Manchester Environmental Resource Centre initiative (MERCi) launched in 1996 is a  charity supporting people to make their communities -and city -more sustainable.

By this we mean a city that is greener, healthier, safer and more equitable. In October 1999 MERCi purchased a 5 storey warehouse in Ancoats which is a tool to work towards this aim.

The Centre (known as Bridge-5 Mill) is a working example of how to live more sustainably in a city. The mill was refurbished employing and training 16 local unemployed people. MERCi used over 80% reclaimed materials and also utilised environmentally friendly materials, incorporating a range of no/low cost energy/ water/waste saving measures that people are able to put into practice in their own homes.

The Centre provides meeting space; office facilities; and support for community projects, voluntary groups and small environmentally friendly businesses across Greater Manchester; an educational exhibition; a public information area; a bank of computers with free access to the internet, and a wide range of training courses and events.

1.5 Britain in Bloom comes to East Manchester.


Like many, MERCi staff had a less than complimentary image of Britain in Bloom. The name conjured up a picture of ladies in twee villages, garden parties and rows of daffodils! In other words a superficial and shallow approach to improving people’s quality of life, glossing over the cracks, dare we say it - spin not substance!

Over the year we were proved wrong and our initial research unearthed huge potential to make real improvements to our communities of Ancoats and Miles Platting.

MERCi and local residents began to see the potential benefits and an opportunity to kick start many much needed initiatives to address a myriad of issues including access to fresh food, lack of quality open space, concerns about vandalism & crime, lack of facilities, services for young people etc.

By ensuring that the competition was community focussed through a wide reaching consultation involving a large number of residents, and by placing emphasis on training and sharing skills - significant benefits could be gleaned for the area.

MERCi therefore began a bid to convince Manchester City Council that Ancoats and Miles Platting should be entered into the competition.

Helen Woodcock of MERCi in her application for funding to Eastside Regeneration stated:
“Our aim is to use this high profile event as a practical way to encourage more people living and working in the area, to become involved in improving their local environment.” 21/7/2000.


2.0 The project.

2.1 How A&MP in Bloom came about.

“The idea grew out of an initial conversation with local residents about planting fruit trees on their housing estate. By the end of the evening we had greened the whole area, were supplying local pubs with fruit wine, and Ancoats & Miles Platting were Britain in Bloom!”  Helen Woodcock

A few weeks after the above conversation there was a presentation and discussion about how the regeneration of East Manchester would effect the local area. The presentation included a list of statistics about the high unemployment, low educational attainment rates and ‘general lack of skills’ in their area - the main solution seeming to be to bring people with money into the area (build big super markets, widen roads etc).

A few residents tried to point out that there were also statistics that highlighted the better qualities and commitment of locals to the area, but mainly people seemed stunned by this somewhat insensitive presentation.

A conversation following the meeting brought up the fact that people in the community were far from apathetic, that in fact some residents had been talking about entering the area into Britain in Bloom.

A few days later MERCi was summoned into the local area regeneration offices and told that the area should indeed apply to be entered as one of Manchester’s entries to Britain in Bloom.

MERCi faced a dilemma. As a result of a provocative comment, MERCi was being asked to enter a competition that it thought was mainly entertainment for affluent villages or about papering over the cracks in cities (we’d failed to read their web site at this stage!).

We thought about it long and hard for the next few days and came up with very clear aims and a strong ethos that the project would have to follow for MERCi to be involved. To our surprise (and slight horror at the amount of work we had just signed up for), the regeneration agency agreed with us.


2.2 Aims.

MERCi strives to ensure that all its work reflects its ethos of respect for both people and the environment. We strive to be fair and transparent in our workings and deliver true lasting benefit to local people.

In the initial bid to Eastside Regeneration MERCi stated:

‘Ancoats and Miles Platting in Bloom’ will be more than this one off event.  The project will throughout the year plant fruit trees, create hanging baskets, turn lawns into vegetable gardens - and aim to be an excellent entry to Britain in Bloom, but we will do this in a way that is of a direct and lasting benefit to the local community.

Our aim would be to use ‘Ancoats and Miles Platting in Bloom’ to be the planting of this seed. The year leading up to it will provide the resources and encouragement for it to start growing into a more permanent sense of responsibility and pride in the area, and a more sustainable local community.

MERCi’s aim from the outset was to use this high profile event as a practical way to encourage more people living and working in the area, to become involved in improving their local environment.


2.3 Fitting the Britain in Bloom bill.

To help argue the case that the area would make a good entry, MERCi identified various ways to meet the criteria practically, in the physical areas defined by the Britain in Bloom guidelines.

Public and community spaces.
  • Work with local residents to turn road verges into flower beds.
  • Plant fruit trees.
  • Plant up currently disused waste land as wild flower meadows.
  • Make unique outdoor furniture & sculptures from recycled materials.
  • Work with the Parks Department and various groups involved in Philips Park to support and highlight the projects happening there - the community orchard & allotments, Tulip Sunday etc.
  • Work with the Council to improve and maintain verges and pathways eg. hanging baskets, floral displays on road islands, removing graffiti, painting lamp-posts etc.

Existing and potential community garden projects.
  • Create new features such as a herb spiral, a living willow sculpture, a rain water collection point.
  • Organise community events at the gardens to stimulate more local involvement.
  • Co-ordinate these gardens so that they focus on different aspects eg one might be a sensory garden, one a raised bed garden, one a cultural garden.


Residential areas.
  • Hold a ‘blooming garden’ competition - with workshops and garden markets (with affordable materials) through residents’ associations and community groups to make this easier for people.
  • Hold a ‘blooming street’ competition - to encourage people to work with their neighbours. 


Schools and community buildings.
  • Hold lessons and workshops on environmental issues from healthy eating to recycling - could include designing posters about keeping the area clean, recycling, or A&MP in Bloom.
  • Create a garden, wildlife area or vegetable patch in school grounds.
  • Start collecting & recycling paper (or publicise the fact that they already do it!).



Local businesses.
  • Work with local shops to improve their shop fronts with hanging baskets, container planting etc.
  • Publicise local events in the shops.
  • · Businesses to become recycling collection points.

2.4 Guiding principles.



In its work MERCi was guided by three principles to ensure an effective and efficient project:

Sustainable Development.
To place sustainability at the core of the project ensuring that the three areas of community, economy and the environment are equally considered. For example, when spending money we would ensure not only that a decision was a sound one economically, but that the local community benefited most (eg purchasing locally), and that the environment was not damaged.

Human focused.
Only by working in a human-focused way – in other words working to ensure initiatives are small scale, accessible and welcoming to all – can we develop sustainable solutions which ultimately are community owned and meet people’s needs and aspirations.

Training.
All events would have a skills sharing element by acknowledging that everyone has knowledge, ideas or skills to pass on, people both learnt and taught in an informal, involving and non-intimidating way.


2.5 Delivering the project.



The way that the project was delivered was probably the most important part of the inBloom programme. There were three main strands to our ‘delivery plan’, to:
  • Acknowledge and support people already involved in improving the area - from those doing their own gardens to those working in community spaces - by consulting them, providing resources, highlighting their work and encouraging more people to join them.
  • Provide information, resources and training both to encourage a wider involvement and to provide people with new, useful and lasting skills (from organic gardening, to nutritional cooking, to the welding of hanging baskets).
  • Build on the strong sense of community already existing in the area, and - through the physical results achieved during this year - create a sense of pride in the local environment and a level of involvement that will continue long after the competition is over.

As a natural progression of the ethos and aim of this project we decided to seek funds to write up our experiences so it could benefit others. The result was this report.

3.0 Community Involvement.


“ And as they walked round the corner and saw the girls waiting to dance and the kids making willow creatures, the judges said ‘MORE COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT?!’ - and I said well you can hardly have a community project without the community being involved.”  Local Resident about the judging day.

3.1 Consultation


Although the project was an idea that originated from conversations with local residents, the first thing MERCi wanted to do was to find out what other members of the community thought about it. MERCi needed to know if people thought it was a good idea, what ideas they had for improving their area, and what help they wanted to make those improvements happen.

MERCi went about this by directly going out to people and asking them for their opinions rather than, as is often the case with ‘community consultation’, expecting people to come to them.

Helen Woodcock started by trying to contact all of the obvious community representatives in the area: tenants and residents groups, youth groups, schools, community groups etc.  and - introduction letters and a fair few phone calls later – began to get invites to various meetings:

“At times this was quite an embarrassing experience. Residents & tenants groups on the whole spend meetings trying to help individual residents to deal with problems in their street (at least in our area). So the meetings would often be big quite intense discussions about crime and security issues, vandalism, repairs problems – and holding police, council officers etc accountable. Then I would stand up and – whilst heating up the room with my glowing cheeks – ask if any one was interested in planting flowers! Actually I never once got the reaction I was dreading, all the groups were really welcoming and seemed happy to get the chance to talk about something positive that they could do themselves.”

The consultation was ongoing throughout the project. Feedback from workshops, and new ideas generated at events and during activities, shaped the future development of the project, and the idea for a more permanent project in the area. As well as activities, events etc being completely defined by what the groups wanted, we attended meetings of the Ancoats, Miles Platting & Collyhurst Community Network - to ensure that the project was as accountable as possible to the community as a whole.

Creative consultation


MERCi found that a good way to get people thinking and talking about creative ways that they could make improvements in their area was by doing a creative activity. We still introduced the in Bloom project at a regular tenants meeting, but then organised a special tenants meeting with an activity – and no business - to focus on coming up with ideas. 

For example at one December tenants meeting we had a holly ring making session, with mince pies. About 15 people between the ages of 11 and 80 learnt how to make holly rings and whilst doing doing so discussed ideas of what they could do in their area (eg childrens workshops, flowering street verges).

It was a great activity for all ages and resulted in a wide range of new ideas for future events, as well as holly rings to decorate their street - and only a few pricked fingers at the end of it!


3.2 Workshops & activities


The criterion for this was that the workshop or activity would in some way improve the local area and/or would be about issues of sustainable development. The workshops and activities took place at schools, with youth groups, and with social groups (friendship clubs, coffee mornings etc). They ranged from wild flower planting with St Marks School, to making a bench out of reclaimed timber with Ancoats Youth and Community Centre (AYCC) youth club. From making flowers with scrap materials with Trinity’s Disabled Peoples club, to carving pumpkins and making pumpkin soup with a group of local children and their parents.

Workshop - Crazy Golf.

St George’s Youth & Community Centre have a small L shaped piece of land surrounding their building. MERCi was asked to do a workshop as part of the Easter Playscheme to brighten up the land, and had invited Helen over to see what was possible, as Sheila was worried about a potential problem with holes made by magpies and rats. Sheila and Helen were laughing about the fact that they were meant to turn all problems into solutions, and that with the holes so well spaced they should make a feature of them – “it would make a great crazy golf course” they joked. The next thing they knew the kids had decided it was a great idea, the management committee had agreed it, and an eco-crazy golf workshop was in the pipeline.

The workshop consisted of young people (aged 5 – 14 years) working in pairs to design a crazy golf hole, and then make a model of it out of a range of scrap materials. The obstacles to the hole had to be on an environmental theme.

At the end of the day they had a six hole golf course with windmills, mills, ponds and trees as obstacles.

The workshop aimed to involve the young people in proposed changes to their centre from the start, and look at environmental issues at the same time. The future plan is to involve parents in building an eco crazy golf course based on their children’s designs. One bid has been unsuccessful, butthe project is still in the pipeline!

See Appendix 7.8 for the workshop programme & materials.

Workshop - reclaimed street furniture

In June 2000 the AMP (Ancoats & Miles Platting) project re-opened the AYCC (Ancoats Youth & Community Centre) on Butler Street, as a venue to provide quality youth provision for the children/young people in and around the area. AMP emphasises the need to work in partnership with other agencies and volunteers ensuring consultations and forward planning before delivering any new service to the young people.

During In Bloom 2001 AMP worked with MERCi who offered the young people the chance to learn woodworking skills with an environmental them. Through a series of 4 carpentry workshops a group of young people learnt basic carpentry skills, and worked with reclaimed timber to create a bench for their youth club.

The young people benefited greatly from their workshops as it has encouraged team working, skill sharing, commitment and has been both educational and creative.


3.3 Events


There were two different kinds of events during the In Bloom period. There were small very local events for an estate or a street which supported small
groups of people or individuals to improve their environment, and to involve neighbours in making a difference to their area.

And there were community-wide events which publicised the in bloom project, acted as a chance to raise awareness about sustainability issues generally, and gave MERCi a chance to get feedback, new ideas and new people who wanted to do something.

The small local events (refered to as pocket projects) came out of contact with resident groups or individual residents - here are a couple of examples:

Pocket  Project -
 Window boxes and Hanging baskets for Padow Street

The aim of this event was to have a window box or hanging basket on every house – with a mixture of flowers and herbs to eat smell and even use medicinally. One resident – Stella-Marie - was really the driving force behind the day – from the planning and publicising to buying the plants.

The day was a great success. The MERCi van turned up full of old floor boards, tools, compost, hanging baskets, trestle tables, trays of herbs, tomatoes, peas - and flowers (to keep the more traditional basket hangers happy!), a volunteer carpenter and some volunteers to provide extra hands. 

Margaret -a local gardening fanatic- started everyone off with a hanging basket lesson, while the floor boards began to turn into a range of different sized window boxes (including something which was closer in size to canoe than a window box), with all ages doing the creating.

When the buffet turned up at lunchtime there were about 20 people hard at it - and a good few had already taken theirs home – and the veggie samosas, moulee and dips went down suprisingly well (it doesn’t always!).

At the end of the day the kids were wanting to set the next date – with a kareoke to celebrate next time. Not every house on the three streets was blooming but a good few were, and as Stella-Marie pointed out – ‘one of them must look like Kew Gardens from the number of baskets one lady snuck off with! No,’ she said, ‘in my 10 years as a community activist in this area this is the best event I’ve ever been part of.’

Pocket  Project - Blooming Balconies.

Victoria Square is the oldest block of sheltered housing flats in Britain.  It is a huge beautiful building with a central court yard garden, and a potential for flowers and greenery to cascade over the balconies that hits you as soon as you walk through the gate.

MERCi was introduced to people in Victoria Square through Ina the local housing officer – who has an obvious dedication to the residents and fully supported the idea of the project. Having discussed some ideas with a couple of residents, MERCi sent round a letter introducing the idea of having a day in the community room to make up balcony boxes that they would then have outside their door and look after. Ina then spent a day with Helen knocking on every door to ask if people were interested. At least 30 people said they were, but others who couldn’t leave their flat were so grateful at having being asked that it was overwhelming. It became even more important to create something that they could also enjoy from their doorways.

So 2 volunteers arrived with 40 balcony boxes, an enormous amount of organic compost and a mixture of hanging and upright plants (upright plants are staggered between the hanging plants so that the boxes look nice from the doorways too). There was a good turn out, lots of chatting and laughing, and helping each other out. Balcony boxes got taken up to those who could not make it down to the event, and an idea was born to have strawberry teas and line dancing – led by two of the residents - on the lawn the day the judges came.


Community-wide events

Garden Markets.

The garden markets were events selling plants, flowers, herbs etc at affordable prices and provided free gardening advice and ideas.

A garden market can be done at no expense. Either you can contact the Council’s Parks Department and negotiate a sale or return deal at very reasonable prices (although your choice of plant will be somewhat limited). Or - if you are organised enough and have some space -you can start your own off or take cuttings from other people’s ga dens. Space will only be needed for the few months leading upto the market (to start the seedlings off). You could do this as a project in a school - the school could then house the seedlings and the children could look after them, and be involved in selling the plants at the garden market.

The garden markets were a way of helping people to brighten up their own gardens without breaking the bank. MERCi also tried to use the events to encourage people who weren’t previously interested in doing their gardens to think about doing so. The aim was to gradually brighten up whole streets, as the gardening trend and cuttings passed over the fences. 

MERCi subsidised plants so that everyone got one free plant and could buy others at half price. Seedlings that children had started off in workshops, were given away, and childrens activities included planting seeds in pots and
making garden decorations (wind tunnels, windmills etc). There were gardening experts at hand to give advice and discuss ideas.

As the project had funding MERCi decided to support small local garden centres by bringing them in and subsidising them to make the prices lower.

MERCi organised two garden market events as part of the in bloom project, one at a local primary school at home time, and one at Bridge-5 Mill on a Saturday.

Garden Competition.

Hand in hand with the garden markets, to encourage more people to brighten up their streets, we held a local garden competition.

The categories were, best:  front garden, kids patch, hanging basket, window box, street, school garden, biggest sunflower, and weirdest vegetable.

There were 12 entries – more than the area’s entries to the Council’s city-wide garden competition (although we encouraged people to enter that too), and 12 winners (we were never into competitiveness!). The prizes were vouchers for plants at a local community garden centre, a compost bin, books on organic gardening, and seeds – to get ready for next year! We had an award ceremony at our big community celebration day.

3.4 Judging Day.


As there were so many groups involved in the project, and over 40 activities and events throughout the spring and summer, it was felt that the judges’ tour of the area should reflect this.  That - hard as it would be in an hour - we should give them a glimpse of what this project was all about. So five points were identified on the tour route where different events could happen on that day. The groups involved in the project picked where they were closest to come and represent their areas involvement – and enjoy the day. The tour of Ancoats & Miles Platting went like this:

1) Bridge 5 Mill – Manchester’s Centre for Sustainable Living, and home of MERCi. The tour started with a preview of the home-made 3 minute ‘In Bloom’ video showing clips of various events throughout the spring & summer. As the judges were running over an hour late we left out the tour of the Centre, and went straight to the next stop, to start meeting the real stars of the show… by bicycle rickshaw! (The year’s programme of sustainability workshops at MERCi had included a number of bike maintenance workshops)

2) Ridgeway Street community garden. MERCi helped initiate this project in 2000 with a group of local children - holding sessions on a Wednesday after school for the young gardeners, and monthly activities to involve all ages. 

Arriving at the garden was a bit like being a film star in a very cheesy film. The kids all ran at us as we walked in the gate – as they’d had the afternoon off school and had been waiting for us for some time. The Medlock Valley High School Steel band had already played and gone, and the Barbeque had been gobbled. But the judges got given a tour of the pizza beds, the salad beds, and the mural by the young gardeners. We eventually managed to disentangle the judges from the kids to take them to stop 3 … by bio-diesel fuelled mini bus! (MERCi has been supporting the creation of a co-op to buy fuel made from recycled chip fat)

3) Navigation Pub – this was the nearest point on route for both St Marks School, St Georges Youth Group, and residents groups including Padstow Street, Tidex, and Ashbury Grove. It is also alongside the canal and has a big green space. So the Youth Group girls did a dance performance with flowers in their hair on a stage decorated with flower pots, a community artist helped people make willow canal beasts, residents had displays of their work, and everyone ate fruit dipped in chocolate and drank free juice from the pub!

The judges hopped back on the bio-diesel powered mini bus and were taken along the side of the canal to their next stop. (The original plan was to travel by canal boat but the canal was empty for maintenance – and even with water the journey may have taken the rest of the day!)

4) New Islington (then known as the Cardroom estate ) – this residents’ group had decided to rise to the challenge and cheer up their estate – even though it was about to become a building site. The group had organised three clean-up and planting days, one with a bring & ‘buy & plant’ stand to raise money to take the children from the estate for an outing in the summer.

This stop was also the closest stop for AYCC youth group and Corpus Christi with St Annes School. So there was a performance by the youth group ‘scrap samba band’ - who had several workshops making drums and costumes out of ‘rubbish’ and learning some samba rhythms. Dressed as bees the band beat and buzzed their way over to a crane, where they did some pollinating and up grew Manchester’s (if not the worlds) biggest daisy chain. The daisy chain had been woven from willow and decorated by school groups.

5) The judges’ final stop was the blooming finale: Victoria Square. As well as the Council’s elaborate floral displays, and the beautiful court yard, we were welcomed with strawberries and cream on the lawn  – and line dancing led by two of the square’s resident line dancers. Again there were displays showing local events, and the judges got to meet children from George Leigh & Anita Street who had reclaimed a corner of their streets to plant flowers.

In the judges’ own words – what a lot of community involvement!


3.5 Celebrating our successes.


One of the things that was slightly frustrating was the setting of dates for judgement day. This was out of our hands, so we were unable to arrange it for a weekend, which meant that many people who had been involved couldn’t be there on the day. (We weren’t in fact told a date until less than a month before, which also made it quite difficult to arrange for young people to have time off school, and to organise the logistics).

So we decided to organise our own big event - on a Saturday so that everyone could make it – to get a chance to see what other streets had been up to, to celebrate all of the amazing things that had happened throughout the project, and to share more ideas for next time.

The event included the garden competition awards, a showing of the ‘In Bloom’ video, the St George’s dance performance, activities old – willow weaving, bike maintenance etc, and new – solar powered DJ-ing, a bike obstacle course. And of course the long awaited racing of the reclaimed timber go-karts (the boys won - but only by cheating!).

4.0 Partnerships.

4.1 Who was involved.


The great strength of In Bloom was the wide range of groups and individuals working in partnership.

Local residents.
Ancoats and Miles Platting in Bloom would not have happened or been the success it was without the enthusiasm and commitment of local people.
People were involved in a number of different ways and at a number of different levels - from defining the events, to the practical organising, to designing the publicity and getting people along. Through the Community Network local people were involved in holding the project accountable, and representatives of the Network were involved in liaising with Council departments at various stages throughout the In Bloom period.

MERCi staff.
MERCi was funded to employ one part time worker (Helen Woodcock) from October 2000 to September 2001.

Helen’s role was to:

  • consult and involve local people;
  • support local groups and individuals to organise events and workshops;
  • organise (and run some) workshops in local schools, youth groups and community groups; organise community wide events;
  • co-ordinate events, publicity and volunteers throughout the project;
  • liase with a number of different departments in the council both locally and city wide about ‘the route’;
  • monitor and evaluate the project;
  • report and be accountable to Eastside Regeneration, the Eastside Regeneration’s environment group, and the local regeneration officers group, as well as MERCi and The Community Network for Ancoats, Miles Platting & Collyhurst.

The reality of this enormous task meant not only that Helen worked full time for a large proportion of the year (including many evenings, and weekends in the summer), but that several other members of MERCi staff had to be roped in too. Three part time paid staff (Hazel, Gill and Sophie) worked for 2 months, and one full time volunteer (Chris) for 2 months.

MERCi recruited over twenty volunteers and employed carpenters, gardeners, artists, and musicians to run skills sharing workshops.



Manchester City Council


Eastside Regeneration.
Eastside were the funders of the Ancoats & Miles Platting In Bloom project, through whom MERCi had to submit their application, outputs and financial monitoring. They also co-ordinated the Eastside environment working group bringing together representatives from Manchester City Council’s Housing Department, Leisure Services, Operational Services, as well as British Waterways and MERCi.

Eastside Regeneration assigned a project officer to the project – Louis Tinker - initially to help MERCi submit the application in the short time scale given to us.  Louis was ‘a little gem’ and was able to support MERCi more than was originally expected. He headed up the application to the City Council to be one of Manchester’s entries, co-ordinated other council departments, and the was involved with the logistics – and some of the creative (if not slightly bizarre) aspects - of the judging route. Louis coped with a lot of frustration from MERCi, and always pushed for the best option for the community where ever he could.

Operational Services.

Arthur, Bill and Russ were our main contacts in this department, and were a great help. They were our short cut to council services – whenever things were under their direct control. They made it possible for us to involve local schools in planting the flower beds, found us free skips to do
community group clear outs, lent us tools and gloves for events, delivered wood chip to the community garden, and generally put time into keeping the area clean and well maintained.

Housing Department.
The Housing Department’s main involvement was through the work at Victoria Square. As well as the ongoing court yard improvements, the Housing Department provided funding for the balcony box event, and the Housing Officer put in a fair bit of leg work to introduce us and get people along.

Caretakers team.
Under the expert and hands-on supervision of George this group of New Deal trainees had the lovely job of clearing rubbish, and tidying up the gardens of abandoned houses. There was a plan to involve the group in designing and landscaping an area in the community garden (as a hopefully more fulfilling part of their job). Due to a number of factors (the oddities of New Deal and the boringness of many of the tasks to name but a few), there was a high turn over of caretakers, and too much rubbish to clear, so unfortunately this didn’t happen.


Others.

British Waterways.
Again our contacts were supportive individuals who had grown up (or still lived) in the Area. They helped out at the clean – up days taking the rubbish away when the council couldn’t make it on a Sunday (and it was too much of a risk to leave a full skip over night). They also offered use of their boat for community events, and were interested in having resident involvement in ideas for the Rochdale canal sides (wild flower areas, sculptures etc).

Urban Splash.
Initially contacted by Louis, Urban Splash were keen to be involved and agreed to cover up their development sites with hoardings decorated with murals, and to knock down an old pub landscaping the gap.  This didn’t materialise quite as planned - due to time pressures (plain hoardings went up and the pub came down). When contacted directly by the in Bloom project Urban Splash persuaded another company to lend us a crane for our world’s biggest daisy chain, and came bearing beer to the first Cardroom clean-up.

4.2 A shared experience.


MERCi is more used to working with people as part of a team and had not previously entered the world of “partnerships”.  The experience presented both benefits and obstacles – as most partnerships probably do.

The hope is that by highlighting the experience of partnership working in this project it will be useful for future projects, both to address some of the obstacles and maximise the potential for workable partnerships and true community benefits.

As highlighted above the project benefited in a number of ways from the various ‘partners’ involved - including ideas, contacts, funding, access to resources and support.

The main obstacles encountered were to do with the council as a ‘big bureaucratic monster’. These were:

Short timescale.
Initially with the go ahead and funding for the project: There was a very tight timescale from the initial request from East side for this project to the date an application had to be submitted (2-3 weeks in July 2000). This felt necessary as the agreed start date was September 2000. However the project did not get the go ahead until January 2001. MERCi had a similar experience when asking for an extension to this project to write up a report and fund raise for a longer term project. In July 2001 we were told this wouldn’t be a problem and again it wasn’t until March 2002 that we got the approval.

Timescales for delivering services.
The other issue with timing was in connection to the planting of flowers. All involved agreed that it would be a great idea to get children involved in the planting of the flower beds. The schools were contacted and best times of the day negotiated - but arranging a date seemed to be impossible. On each occasion we were given 2 days notice at the most and sometimes told the day before. This was due to the fact that no one could say when the flowers were going to turn up at the depot. Unfortunately it meant that some children had to miss out because their parents couldn’t be contacted.

Competition focussed.
The Ancoats & Miles Platting in Bloom project was very much about using the competition to encourage people to start improving and enjoying their environment. For the individuals representing the Council the pressure was on them to win the competition. This caused tension in a number of ways, but was always linked to availability of and focus for resources.

The In Bloom project would work with any group of residents living in Ancoats or Miles Platting, where as the wider Council resources would only go into the parts of the area that were on the judging route. This meant that certain streets were richly decorated with hanging baskets and barrier baskets and anew flower beds provided and maintained by the Council, but that a street round the corner wouldn’t have been touched.

The Council responded to this by diverting enquiries to the In Bloom (community) project - where those not on the judging route could get support. This led to confusion about the links between the In Bloom project and the Council, the role of the project and the availability of resources.

The Councils’ £80,000 or so budget meant that In Bloom (community) project (with a budget of £9,000 over 8 months of activities) couldn’t help ‘off route’ streets to look anything like those on the judging route. Spending £2-3,000 on an ‘Ancoats in Bloom’ flower bed - without involving the youth club that it was located outside, didn’t really help the confusion.

Sustainability.
There were certain differences in gardening methods that led to some
disagreements. The main issues were the use of pestcides, planting of annual bedding plants, and the need for quick clearances of ‘messy areas’.  MERCi wanting to:
  • let a project develop at the rate that a group can manage - rather than starting with the total clearance of a large area, that a group may not be able to keep on top of (which feels very disillusioning)
  • leave some nettle/bramble areas (in appropriate places) for wildlife;
  • use alternatives to pesticides;
  • plant some perennials in the street verges rather than just annuals.

There were also a few differences in expectations towards the judging date. For example the slow process of developing a community garden versus wanting a finished product with an amazing water feature.

The project did manage to stick to its small scale, community and environmentally focussed aims, and (a few struggles aside) the council workers on the ground supported our ideas. In 2002 the community garden even got offered a choice of perennial plants by a new Council contact who had heard we were ‘traditional gardeners’ - so things do trickle down in small ways.

There are pressures that determine the methods used, as the project and Council workers often discussed. For example the Council do recieve complaints about weeds, and time constraints on workers that stop them trying alternatives to pesticides in response to this. There are longer term ways of addressing these issues, but these need to be taken on board by the Council as a whole - not just individual workers. 
5.0 Gauging impact.

   
Although MERCi and the residents of Ancoats and Miles Platting were highly praised within the North West’s Britain in Bloom Urban Category we felt that much more could be done in the future to improve both the way a project such as this could operate and ultimately the long term impact.

In the Autumn after the big celebration MERCi began to review its involvement in and overall experience of the inBloom project.

5.1 Impact


The Ancoats and Miles Platting in Bloom project was a huge success. Through the project: over 40 local groups and over 1000 individuals actively participated in community activities, and as a result of this many more people in the area joined in to keep the area tidy, water the flowers etc; there were comments from residents and visitors throughout the summer months about how nice the area looked; and 2 years on MERCi still recieved enquiries as to when they would be doing In Bloom again.

So there was definitely a positive impact short term - but did it last until ‘long after the competition was over’ as had been hoped?

Most of the activities throughout the period were one off events - although this doesn’t necessarily mean that the impact ends there. Indeed the
following year some groups applied directly to the Council to do events - but there were much less of these and the feedback was that the support was sorely missed.

There were examples in 2001 of projects that went further than the one event. For example after hands on support from the worker for the first clean-up event, the Cardroom groupwent on to organise two more events that summer. The woodwork sessions with the youth groups provided lasting skills and lead on to further carpentry sessions organised by the group, and ideas for regular environmental sessions.

These results are very inspiring, and what became apparent was that there was definitely potential to make more of an impact long term.

What also became apparent was that community activists already have too much going on to take on another regular commitment (although they will still try!), and that for others it can be hard building up the confidence to go along to an event, never mind taking on organising it.

The key to having an impact in a long term sustainable way is committed long term support.

5.2 Ideas for development.


“The children here today are helping to create the sort of community and environment which they want to grow up in. They are the future of this community and are admirable. Their commitment and enthusiasm does them credit. I am sure they will take great pride in knowing that they were part of the team which brought about this transformation.”  Councillor Martin Pagel, Deputy Leader of Manchester City Council 20th March 2001.

At the end of the inBloom judging in July 2001  – local people decided that they didn’t want it to end. Not only had people had a good time, the area was starting to look better. The flowerbeds had not been vandalised, the kids were eating the lettuces they had grown in their community garden, & residents of streets without flowerbeds wanted to know how to get them.

The feed back was that this proactive community led way of working was hugely successful – but that it is not enough. For a community that has been neglected for as long as this one, continued support is desperately needed:- to build people’s confidence in what they are doing, to help them to engage more people, and to help with longer term planning and access to information.

“This has been a good start but one-off events don’t give people what they need to carry on exploring and challenging their circumstances. We need more permanent engagement of issues that are fundamentally important to people – perennial rather than annual - to use a gardening phrase!”
Helen Woodcock

When MERCi initially proposed and sought funding to write this report and secure funding for a long term worker and budget, we were asked instead to run another summer of In Bloom activities (in a shorter period of time and with a smaller budget). Given the choice the Community Network said that they wanted to look to longer term solutions, even if it meant missing out on a summer of events.

So funding was secured to put in a series of applications for a two year project (including a full time worker and budget), and to write this report of the lessons learnt - for the benefit of this community, other communities, and organisations working with communities in this kind of situation.

MERCi also supported the Community Network in the recruitment and induction of the worker, and ran training sessions to ensure that the
Management Committee felt confident in - and shared an understanding between them of - the management of the project and worker.

MERCi in partnership with the local Community Network of residents, Tenants, Community groups, and Voluntary groups set out to secure funds to build on the work of the In Bloom team. Bids to the New Opportunities Fund SEED programme, Awards For All, and the John Grant Davis Trust were successful.
Funding was secured for a worker for two years to help people make their communities more sustainable. The project was named SCENE - Sustainable Communities, Environmental Neighbourhoods.

The objectives of the SCENE project are:

1) to raise peopless perception of the relevance and importance of living more sustainably.
2) to increase the feeling of control that people have over their own environments.
3) to increase the number of people actively involved in making their areas/lives more sustainable.

5.3 Improvements and Reccommendations


Workers:

The following is a list of recommendations for those working in and with under-resourced communities - Council, Agency, Community workers etc (and for those living there to see what they should expect):

  • Acknowledge and act on the fact that it takes communities time to organise volunteers, raise funds and collect resources.
  • Acknowledge and cater for the fact that communities may have different motivations for involvement to paid workers – eg activities for children, immediate improvement in the area, the social aspect of a project etc.
  • Find interesting ways to consult people eg events with activities - ie give people a reason to turn up and give you their time.
  • Decision processes need to be transparent –  many communities are wary of the Council’s motives and pessimistic about their services.
  • Have a way of feeding back the results of any consultation so that people know what has come of their input and why.

Language should always be clear and jargon free to be accessible to as many people as possible.

  • Timing of events should realise that people have jobs, family commitments, child care needs etc.
  • Think through venues carefully -think about public transport, accessibility (remember venues with alcohol are not appropriate for some religions and cultures) - ask local people for suitable places to hold events.
  • Offer entertainment for children at meetings, as well as food and drinks.
  • People often have high expectations of what the Council could deliver if the political will was there. Be clear about your resources and aims. Don’t raise expectations without a realistic idea of what can be achieved.
  • Consult from the outset, listen to the replies and act on what you find. Again be clear about what it is you are asking, what you are offering, and the time-scale - when people are likely to see any results.
  • Have a way of feeding back the results of any consultation so that people  know what has come of their input and why.
  • Be clear about funding time-scales, don’t promise until you know when you can deliver -planning very difficult otherwise.
  • If you are building a partnership – remember it should be a partnership of equals!
  • Building trust and developing relationships takes time - this is why longer term projects have a longer lasting impact.

Community groups and individuals

People often find working with the local authority (LA) and regeneration agencies both daunting and frustrating. To make this process mutually beneficial the following recommendations may be helpful:

  • Identify the right person in the LA/agency to communicate with – and choose one person from your group to act as the contact with them (this lessens the possibility of crossed wires).
  • Approach a new contact with a question or ask for advice - acknowledging someone’s skills or knowledge
  • Where possible go to meetings in pairs - it is useful to have two people listening/making notes and it can help to go over things afterwards.
  • Be aware that there may be people who will try to play you off against other people in your community - communicate fully with the people in your group/community (especially if you are the contact) - feed back meetings and don’t make big decisions without taking them back to your group first (this should happen anyway).
  • At all meetings write minutes and send the minutes to the attendees – this will reinforce the decisions made and remind people of the work they have promised to do.
  • Keep notes from phone conversations and file these away safely with the date and time of the conversation.
  • Make clear the limits of your resources, your aims and reasons for being involved and state your timescales etc.
  • Remember council workers and regeneration agency people are there to serve your community. Although it is desirable and more productive  to have a good relationship with them, if you are unhappy with their work ask them about their organisations system for collecting comments    and recommendations.
  • Allow enormous amounts of time to get your project on the road if it relies on Council go ahead or funding.
  • Talk to Operation Services - and other departments of the Council - right at the beginning and see if you can have an influence on the plants and other relevant aspects of the Council’s work in your area – if possible go with a list of ideas.
  • Finally you will at some time be asked to justify what you are doing in terms of who’s behind you and how much support you have (particularly if what you want to do disagrees with what the Council or other agencies are doing). As long as you have support locally with clear and going consultation porcesses this shouldn’t be a problem.

Recommendations to the council:

Finally we felt that although there is definitely a lot that individuals can do to make a project as beneficial to the community as possible, there are certain fundamental issues that need to be addresses by the Council as a whole.
These include:

  • Explore, acknowledge the benefit of, and make greater use of ‘soft outputs’ - focus on quality (eg how people feel about their area), rather than quantity (eg number of people into training).
  • Make a greater commitment to supporting such community led initiatives and nurturing relationships with local groups.
  • Frontline Council and agency workers should be trained in communication and consultation techniques to ensure inclusivity when dealing with local communities.
  • Greater transparency in budgets.
  • It is important that workers representing the Council are accountable to the local community.

6.0 Resources.


      Gardening Supplies.

  British Trust for Conservation Volunteers.
  [t] 0161 608 0498 [f] 0161 608 0497 [w] www.btcv.org
  A charity supporting volunteers in environmental and conservation projects.
  Catalogue of plants, trees available from BTCV Enterprises [t] 0130 257 2200

  Chorlton Nursery.
  [a] 18a Vicars Road, Chorlton  [t] 0161 881 8142
  Open Wednesdays – Fridays 10 am –5pm Saturday & Sunday 10am – 6pm
  Offers a wide range of plants and vegetables.

  City Centre Garden Centre.
  [a] 30 - 36 Swan Street [t] 0161 832 5834
  Garden Centre based in central Manchester.

  Fairfield Composting.
  [t] 0161 223 8200 or 0161 370 9745 [e] email [w] www.gmcomposting.co.uk
  Manchester’s leading composters offering support, training and compost bins.

  Henry Doubleday Research Association.
  [t]01247 630 3517 [e]enquire[ at ]hdra.org.uk  [w]www.hdra.org.uk
  Britain’s leading organic research charity offering a wide range of seeds and plants for sale.

  Hulme Community Garden Centre.
  [a] Old Burley Street, Hulme, Manchester. [t] 0161 226 5565  [e]info[ at ]hulmegardencentre.org.uk        
www.hulmegardencentre.org.uk   [w] www.hulmegardencentre.org.uk
  Manchester’s only community owned and run garden centre.

  Props, entertainers etc.

  Grumpy.
  [a] Vaughan Street, West Gorton, Manchester, M12 5DU [t] 0161 223 9730/04
  [e] email [w] www.grumpy.org.uk
  Offers a range of children’s and educational resources to schools, and groups working with children 
  and young people (membership required).

  Manchester Environmental Education Network.
  Laura Williams [t] 0161 273 8881 [e] meen[ at ]gn.apc.org
  Extensive network of educators, teachers and schools working on environmental education.

  Space Cadets.
  [w] www.spacecadets.co.uk
  Offers a range of workshops and performances for indoor and outdoor events.

  Streets ahead.
  [t] 0161 224 0020 [f] 0161 248 9331 [e] anne[ at ]streetsahead.org.uk [w] www.streetsahead.org.uk
  Can loan a variety of equipment including rickshaws, and have a vast knowledge about community  
  arts groups and holding events.

Workers Film Association.
[t] 0161 848 9782/5 [f] 0161 848 9783 [e] wfa[ at ]timewarp.co.uk
Multimedia centre with editing suites (useful for making videos of events), and training courses.

Local East Manchester contacts.

Ancoats, Miles Platting & Collyhurst Community Network.
[a] The Community Space, The Cariocca Business Park, Sawley Rd, Miles Platting, Manchester. [t] 0161 203 6390

Beswick  & Bradford Community Project .
[a] Beswick & Bradford Community Project, The Grange, Pilgrim Drive, Beswick, M11 3TQ [t] 0161 230 1420 [e] bbcp[ at ]manchestersettlement.org.uk

East Manchester Community Forum and East Manchester Voluntary and Community Sector Consortium.
[t] 0161 230 7843 [e] voluntaryconsortium[ at ]trainingproject.fs.net.co.uk
Offers support and training for residents and groups in East Manchester.

Childcare and Play Officer.
Alison Jones  [t] 0161 205 5508

Manchester Community Nutrition Service.
[c] Hazel Andrews [a] Manchester Community Nutrition Service Cornerstone, Graham Street Manchester M11 3AA [t] 0161 230 2244 [e] andrewsh[ at ]manchesternw.nhs.uk
Offers advice on all areas of food and nutrition.



Voluntary Groups offering information/resources/support.

Community Technical Aid Centre (C-TAC).
[t] 0161 236 5195 [e] info[ at ]ctac.co.uk [w] www.ctac.co.uk
Offers support in landscape design.

Manchester Area Resource Centre (MARC).
[t] 0161 819 0819 [e] marc[ at ][w] www.marcltd.freeserve.co.uk
Printing and design service for the community and voluntary sector.

Manchester Environmental Resource Centre initiative (MERCi).
c/o Bridge-5 Mill, 22a Beswick Street, Ancoats, Manchester M4 7HR. [t] 0161 273 1736 [e] merci[ at ]bridge-5.org [w] www.bridge-5.org
Manchester’s leading environmental charity working in all areas of community empowerment including food co-ops, community gardens and training.

Manchester Friends of the Earth.
[t] 0161 834 8221 [e] office[ at ]manchesterfoe.org.uk [w] http://www.manchesterfoe.org.uk
Local branch of National Friends of the Earth. Offers advice on all areas of the environment.

Manchester Wildlife.
[t] 0161 437 7040 [w] http://www.bridge-5.org/tenants
Voluntary group offering advice on wildlife and environmental matters.
   Manchester Youth Volunteering Project.
  [a] Manchester Youth Volunteering Project, 491 Mill Street Venture Centre, Mill Street, Openshaw,  
   Manchester M11 2AD [t] 0161 223485
  Opportunities and support for young people.

  Voluntary Action Manchester  (VAM).
  [t] 0161 236 3206 [e] info[ at ]vamanchester.org.uk [w] www.vamanchester.org.uk
  One stop shop for all your community and voluntary sector needs.

  Workers Education Association.
  [t] 0161 277 5400 [f] 0161 274 4948 [w] www.nw.wea.org.uk
  Provides courses for Manchester’s residents including training in gardening and cooking.

  Statutory bodies - City Council and regeneration agencies.

  Greater Manchester Ecology Unit.
  [t] 0161 342 3596/7

  Jackie Pownall.
  EnvironmentalServices, Manchester City Council, 2nd floor, Pink Bank Lane M12 5QN
  Manchester City Councils Manchester in Bloom contact

  Manchester Housing.
  [t] 0161 234 5000 - go through the Council switchboard and ask for your local housing office

  Manchester City Council’s one stop shop [t] 0161 954 9000 [f] 0161 957 8397
   For questions, requests or complaints regarding:
   Urban Hygiene    
   Street Cleansing       
   Street lighting        
   Grounds maintenance   

  Free skips for community events can be obtained from:
  Contract Management Section, Operational Services, Hooper Street, Ardwick,  Manchester M12 6LA

Parks and Open spaces.
Jeff Staniforth - City Parks Manager, Leisure Services, Alexandra Park Office, Russell Street, Moss Side, 
Manchester, M16 7JL [t] 0161 953 2450
Bell Vue Leisure Centre, Pink Bank Lane, Longsight, M12 5GL [t] 0161 953 2450
Debdale Park Office, 1073 Hyde Rd, Gorton, Manchester, M18 7LJ [t] 0161 223 8278

Dangerous Buildings Department.
City Architects Department, Town Hall, Manchester, M60 2LA [t]  0161 234 4333

Early years and play
Head quarters [t]  0161 234 7111

Education Action Zone
[t]  0161 223 1166

Joint Health Unit
Regeneration Agencies and related organisations
Regeneration Agencies and related organisations

Eastside Regeneration.
Colleen Scott - New East Manchester, Company Suite, Waulke Mill, 51 Bengal Street, Ancoats M4 6LN  [t] 0161 950 4300 [f] 0161 950 4305

Ancoats Urban Village Company.
Company Suite, Waulke Mill, 51 Bengal Street, Ancoats M4 6LN  [t] 0161 211 1012 [f] 0161 950 4305

New East Manchester.
[t] 0161 223 1155 [e] info[ at ]neweastmanchester.com [w] www.neweastmanchester.co.uk

Groundwork.
Phoenix House, 61 Spear Street, Manchester, MA 1DF  [t] 0161 237 5656  [f] 0161 237 3939
[w] www.groundwork.org.uk

British Waterways.
[t] 01952 847700

Media


East Manchester Advertiser.
[t] 0161 643 3615 [e] middletonguardian[ at ]gmwn.co.uk

Eastserve.
[w] www.eastserve.com

Have Your Say Magazine.
The Community Space, Cariocca Business Park, Sawley Road, Miles Platting, Manchester, M40.
[e] maggi[ at ]haveyoursay.freeserve.co.uk

Manchester Evening News.
[t] 0161 832 5351 [e] newsdesk[ at ]men-news.co.uk [w] www.manchesteronline.co.uk

Mymanchester.
[t] 0161 203 4422  [e]  info[ at ]mcin.net [w] www.mymanchester.net
Community website maintained by Manchester Community Information Network

Radio Regen.
[t] 0161 237 5012 [e] info[ at ]radioregen.org [w] www.radioregen.org
Community Radio in Manchester

South Manchester Reporter.
[t] 0161 446 2213 [f] 0161 434 9921 [e] southmanchesterreporter[ at ]gmwn.co.uk

Websites

bridge-5 Mill - Manchester’s Centre for Sustainable Living - www.Bridge-5.org

Britain in Bloom website - www.rhs.org.uk/britaininbloom

fun food - www.coolmeals.co.uk

British Nutritional Foundation - www.nutrition.org.uk

Goodguide - www.healthyfoods.com

BBC food recipes - www.bbc.co.uk/food

Permaculture Association - www.permaculture.org.uk




Appendix one: Ancoats and Miles Platting economic and social statistics


Physical Character

Ancoats is the cradle of the industrial revolution and adjacent areas further east like Bradford became highly industrialised. The area was home to heavy industry until relatively recently including coal mining, gas production and other chemical processes.

Today the communities of Ancoats and Miles Platting are very under-resourced. Changes in industrial practices and the flight of people from the inner cities has left the area one of the poorest in Britain:

 “East Manchester’s physical environment reflects its status as a historic industrial area. This has left the area with great physical assets including historic buildings and waterways. It has also left the challenges of many derelict and under used buildings, and large areas of vacant and degraded land. Of East Manchester’s 1,100 hectares, approximately 30% are vacant.”


Population

“East Manchester has seen a dramatic decline in population over recent years. In 1991, the total population of the area was 36,170, representing 8.9% of the total Manchester population. By 1999, the population had declined to 31,503, a 12.9% reduction. In contrast, the population of the rest of Manchester grew during this period by 3.5%.”
 

Ancoats and Miles Platting has a higher than average number of single adult houses with children.

“East Manchester’s population is characterised by a higher proportion of young and retired people but fewer of working age compared to Manchester, the North West and the UK. Those who are of working age are typically low earners and many are unemployed and in receipt of benefits. The current unemployment rate is 8.2%, more than double the Greater Manchester and national average.”  


Health

“East Manchester has higher morbidity and earlier death rates than Manchester which itself has rates far in excess of the national average. The area also has an overall mortality rate over 50% higher than the national average. Death from lung cancer is twice the national average and respiratory disease is well above the national average. 68% of under 5’s suffer from dental disease, and the area has one of the highest pre-16 conception rates in the country.” 
   www.neweastmanchester.com/pages/publications.html


Economy

“East Manchester currently has lower relative levels of economic activity than Manchester as a whole, Greater Manchester, the North West and the UK. In 1971 the area supported 34,000 jobs, 63% of which were in manufacturing. Between 1971 and 1985 20,000 of these jobs were lost to the area due to business closures mainly in the manufacturing and construction sectors.”   

“The East Manchester economy is still dominated by manufacturing, distribution and catering. Conversely the market is under-represented in the professional services sector – i.e. banking, finance and insurance. There are major problems facing the area in terms of workforce development.”


“Many local businesses find it difficult to recruit locally; indeed 40% of businesses in East Manchester claim not to recruit from the local area. From the opposite perspective, people in East Manchester have difficulties in finding work. One tenth of unemployed residents have never had a paid job, and a further 38% have been out of work for two years of more.”  

“Research shows that skill levels within East Manchester are low and that there is a general lack of the right practical and vocational skills (particularly IT, basic literacy and numeracy, and life skills) required to secure the jobs that are on offer. This gap is likely to widen given projected economic growth sectors, unless there is a substantial and sustained improvement in the impact of investment in education and training.”
   www.neweastmanchester.com/pages/publications.html



Education and Training

Levels of educational attainment for many children are poor and there are low staying-on rates in learning post-16, as illustrated by the following indicators for East Manchester:

  • below the Manchester average scores in Key Stage 1 and 2 core subjects;
  • poor scores at Key Stages 3 and 4 and GCSE; 19% of pupils achieve no GCSEs (compared with 10% for the whole of the Manchester City Council area);
  • only 22% of pupils get 5 or more grade A-C GCSEs (compared to 30% in Manchester and 45% nationally);
  • the low proportion (47%) of school leavers progressing to further education or training (compared with 53% for Manchester).
  • poor scores at Key Stages 3 and 4 and GCSE; 19% of pupils achieve no GCSEs (compared with 10% for the whole of the Manchester City Council area);
  • only 22% of pupils get 5 or more grade A-C GCSEs (compared to 30% in Manchester and 45% nationally);
  • the low proportion (47%) of school leavers progressing to further education or training (compared with 53% for Manchester).




Appendix two: Blooming Edibles
 
We also proposed a focus on food – working to raise awareness of nutrition and healthy eating. As well as the educational and health value of this focus, we thought that it would be a unique theme for the Britain in Bloom competition.


We proposed the inclusion of:

  • workshops on growing vegetables, salads and herbs – with a seed give-away at the end of the session.
  • growing beautiful edibles plants - hanging baskets/window baskets/street verges to be planted up with edible flowers or vegetables which produce beautiful flowers, trees planted to be fruit trees.
  • cooking/healthy eating workshops - how to cook healthy, delicious  food
  • The production of recipe cards (to be given out at events/ put in local magazine)
  • supporting the creation of the food co-op and producing vegetable cards (explaining what they are, how to cook them and recipe ideas)
 
East Side regeneration agency did not share this vision, so it was not a main theme.

Subsequently we have developed this interest with local groups into a food co-operative, cooking courses and recipe cards. In the future we hope to build on the theme of ‘blooming edibles’ for promoting health.

Section

Max points
Section A

Floral Displays.









30% of maximum points.   
Public parks , town gardens, war memorials and recreational areas.

Public buildings, displays associated with roads including roundabouts.

Business and commercial – shop and retail centres etc.

Residential gardens.

Special floral features including hanging baskets, containers, bedding displays

Community involvement – design, planting and maintenance
10


10


10



10


10
Section B

Permanent Landscaping – including scrubs.
20% of maximum points.   
Housing developments.

Industrial estates etc.

Parks, road verges etc.

Community involvement including voluntary groups
10

10

10

10
Section C

Local Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development.
20%
Nature conservation and bio-diversity

Knowledge of recycling sites etc.

Community involvement in
15

15

10
Section D

Local Environmental Quality.

20% of maximum points.

Cleanliness of high profile areas.

Cleanliness of parks, gardens, car parks etc.

Weeds, street furniture, litter & dog bins etc

Community involvement
10

10

10

10
Section E
Public Awareness
10%
Marketing, publicity and promotion of Britain in Bloom etc.
20





Appendix five: The benefits of comunity gardens.

Researchers in the United States have learned a lot about the psychological and socio-economic benefits of community greening projects. Here are a few findings:

  1. Community greening grows leaders - A study of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s community greening efforts in the City of Brotherly Love found that “across all neighbourhoods, people who have not previously been involved in a leadership capacity have emerged. These garden leaders assume responsibility for organising the neighbours to carry out the project and for maintaining the project.”
  2. Community greening can help feed people and save money - Numerous studies have found that home and community gardens produce food worth hundreds of pounds. These food and financial savings can be critically important to the nutritional and financial health of families living on low incomes or in neighbourhoods poorly served by grocery stores.
  3. Community greening promotes healthier communities - In a 1980 study of 100 blocks of Atlanta, Georgia, D.R. Brogan and L.D James found that physical characteristics (such as the presence of plants) were as important in promoting psychosocial health as the residents’ socio-cultural backgrounds.
  4. Community greening helps people learn about civic participation - Marti Ross Bjornson, a graduate student at North Western University, found that inner-city Chicago gardeners gained critical skills in working with their elected officials by becoming involved in greening projects. She concluded that through greening “these formerly marginalised urban residents can gain access to the public policy, economic resources and social interaction...”
  5. Community greening helps save energy and keep urban air cool and clean - As early as the 1840’s, greening advocates were calling parks and gardens “ the lungs of the city”. In Sacramento, California, the planting of 500,000 shade-giving urban trees is expected to save 50 to 75 megawatts of electricity by the year 2010 - enough to cool 26,000 homes, and in Chicago, researchers found that the urban forest removed tons of pollutants from the air each day.
  6. Community greening provides job training - Community greening projects have been a training ground for people interested in entering the horticultural sector, particularly in inner-city areas where jobs can be scarce and skills hard to acquire.
  7. Community greening helps reduce stress - A wide range of psychological and physiological studies have found that exposure to green plants can relieve stress, especially in urban areas where excessive noise and movement can make stress levels rise.
  8. Community greening can help the homeless - Community gardens are a source of food for the homeless in some cities, and the community garden plot can also be “the first step towards self-sufficiency,” notes Ishwarbhai C Patel, who leads urban gardening programs in New Jersey. The garden provides “a place to call ‘mine’ and the opportunity to grow and produce things of value,” he says.
  9. Community greening helps preserve cultural heritage - In a 1992 study of San Jose, California’s ‘Community and Cultural Heritage Gardens’, J.Dotter found that the gardens provided people with an important opportunity to maintain their cultural heritage by growing plants that play an important role in their culture’s food or rituals.
  10. Community greening provides places for children to play and learn - A number of studies have found that community gardens and green spaces can play an important role in child development. For example, a garden can teach children how food is grown and what it looks like before arriving at the checkout counter.
  11. Community greening helps cities save money by recycling - Greening projects often require tons of soil and an integral part of gardening is the composting of waste. Over 60% of domestic waste is compostable and would result in a large reduction in waste going to landfill sites.
  12. Community greening makes people more productive - Psychologists have found that plants and green spaces provide the human mind with a rest. As a result, workers who have access to green spaces are more productive.
  13. Community greening helps people keep physically fit - In 1990, M.K.Taylor found that a gardener could burn more calories in one hour of work than someone doing aerobics.

Appendix six: Concerns about Glysophate.

Glyphosate (Round-up weedkiller) is claimed to be the world’s biggest selling herbicide by its manufacturer Monsanto. It is also said to be highly effective at killing weeds, safe to users and members of the public and harmless to the environment. Is it the perfect product that herbicide users want and that anti-pesticide campaigners can find no fault with?

There is growing concern about the weedkillers impact on the environment and people’s health and a growing number of people are boycotting the herbicide: “Glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide, is already banned from being used in most US schools because it was found to change the oestrus cycle in girls.”

While glyphosate itself may be relatively harmless, some of the products with which it is formulated have a rather less benign reputation. Marketed formulations of glyphosate generally contain a surfactant. The purpose of this is to prevent the chemical from forming into droplets and rolling off leaves which are sprayed. Some of these surfactants are serious irritants, toxic to fish, and can themselves contain contaminants which are carcinogenic to humans.

The most widely used type of surfactants are serious irritants of eyes, the respiratory tract and skin, and have been found to contain dioxane (not dioxin) contaminants which are suspected of being carcinogenic.

In a letter from Stephen Tvedten to the director of the State of California, Department of Pesticide Regulation, he advised against the use of Round-up highlighting a number of concerns about the chemical:

(1) Ingestion of RoundUp has been shown to cause “irritation of the oral mucous membrane and gastrointestinal tract…pulmonary dysfunction, oliguria, metabolic acidosis, hypotension, leukocytosis and fever.”

(2)  A study by eminent oncologists Dr. Lennart Hardell and Dr. Mikael Eriksson of Sweden has revealed clear links between glyphosate to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a form of cancer. In the study published in the 15 March 1999 Journal of American Cancer Society, the researchers also maintain that exposure to glyphosate ‘yielded increased risks for NHL.’

(3) The NY Attorney General’s office sued Monsanto for advertising that RoundUp herbicide is “safe” and “environmentally friendly.” While Monsanto admitted no error, they settled with NY, paying them a couple of hundred thousand dollars, and agreeing to refrain from advertising RoundUp herbicide in New York as “safe” and “environmentally friendly.” The NY Attorney General began challenging these ads in 1991, and the case finally settled in 1997. (Further information available at www.igc.org/panna/resources/_pestis/PESTIS.1997.2.html). When Monsanto subsequently violated this agreement, they were again called to task by the NY Attorney General for breach of the settlement agreement. They again backed off their advertising campaign for RoundUp in New York only.

In the UK, a local authority was prosecuted after a child was accidentally sprayed with a glyphosate formulation and suffered allergic reactions. Recently there have also been claims from residents of St. Just in Cornwall that they have suffered severe reactions following application of glyphosate for weed control.



Appendix seven: Why Peat-Free Compost?

MERCi attempted to make Ancoats and Miles Platting in Bloom a peat-free compost affair because of concerns about the environmental damage caused by mining peat:

Peatbogs are some of the UK’s best wildlife habitats, home to many rare insects and plants. Despite this the commercial peat industry, led by companies such as Levington’s (owned by US company Scott’s), are destroying them to provide peat, mainly for gardeners. Some of the nation’s top wildlife sites (Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) are currently threatened by peat extraction. One such site, Thorne Moor, in Yorkshire, is home to over 3000 species of invertebrate.

As gardening has become more popular more and more peat has been extracted from the UK’s most important wildlife sites. They have been described by Prince Charles as the UK’s “tropical rainforests” because of the wide-range of species they support.

Today only 6 per cent of lowland raised bogs remain in a near-natural condition.

As a response, thousands of gardeners have being doing their bit to protect peat bogs - by refusing to buy peat.  A growing number of garden centres like B&Q, Homebase, Focus and Wyevale Country Gardens have promised to phase-out peat-based products,

Indeed, in a 2001 edition of BBC Gardeners World magazine, a massive 74% of gardeners would now support a peat ban.

Peat-free gardening is easy. It requires no specialist skill other than purchasing peat-free compost.

The National Trust, which operates 200 of the nation’s finest gardens, is completely peat-free and the “Eden Project” in Cornwall was developed without using peat.



Some facts about peat bogs:

Raised bogs are formed by the slow decay of plants such as sphagnum mosses over thousands of years, trapping water on flat lowland areas to form quivering domes of water-logged peatland, rich in wildlife.

They are amongst the most important wildlife sites in the UK, and have been described by Prince Charles as the UK’s “tropical rainforests” because of the wide range of species they support. Over 3000 species of invertebrates, such as the hairy canary fly, as well as wild birds like the nightjar, and plants such as the carnivorous round-leaved sundew have been recorded at Thorne Moor alone.

Large scale peat extraction causes irreparable damage to raised bog SSSIs through the removal of surface vegetation, the drying and removal of the peat itself, and drastic changes to th hydrological integrity of the wetland.



Appendix eight: Workshop plan - Design an ‘eco crazy golf course’.

Aims
· To build 6 crazy golf holes, as a model and potential design for a proposed golf course on the land surrounding their building
· To involve the children/young people in the proposed changes to their centre from the outset
· To be creative using ‘rubbish’
· To think about the environment by having an environmental theme to the crazy golf course designs


Programme of activities
11-12: Make a golf club.
Introduced the plan for the day to the group – asking if any of them had been to a crazy golf course. Made golf clubs – with a pea cane as the handle and cardboard folded double and stuck with tape around the end of the cane to make a club shape (first ask the group to describe the shape, & ideas for how to make one etc).
Name the golf clubs – each child thought up their favourite or weirdest name and wrote it on the club shaped bit so that no one would get their clubs muddled up.


12-1: Lunch Break


1-3: Making the crazy golf holes
As a group they came up with ideas for decorating the holes and obstacles for the balls – based on what they liked in the environment and environmental themes – windmills, water wheels, sunshine etc. They then split into pairs or threes to design and create their crazy golf hole. The base for each hole was made out of a box like a pizza box (so that one flap could become the lead up to the hole and potentially a slope). They decided where the hole was to go and then we made them. We also showed them how to make a windmill with blades that would turn in the wind. They designed and made the rest themselves with tips and wire cutting from us if required.


3-4: Clean up, followed by laying out the six creations as a crazy golf course on the land outside and a test run with their own golf clubs – and a photo shoot.


Numbers:
Two workshop leaders (with play scheme leaders close at hand if needed)
15 children & young people between the ages of 5 and 14 (already attending the play scheme)



Appendix nine: Examples of inBloom leaflets.


flyer 1.


flyer 2.


Apendix ten: City Council Press Releases.

MANCHESTER ON TARGET TO SCOOP TOP BRITAIN IN BLOOM AWARD
5 April 2001   

Following Manchester’s recent success in winning North West in Bloom 2000, confidence is growing that the city is on target to scoop the top National award in 2001. In order to realise this dream, Manchester will have to beat off fierce competition, but it is an achievable goal say the organisers.

As a finalist in last year’s Cleanest City Competition Manchester was pitched against cities like Bath and York, but achieved more than any other large city in the competition.

Councillor Martin Pagel, Deputy Leader of Manchester City Council, said: ‘This is a title we are more than capable of winning. We are currently reaping rewards for the years of hard work which have turned a city, declared in 1994 to be the dirtiest in the UK, into the third most popular tourist destination after London and Edinburgh. Last year we won North West in Bloom and for two years running we have been finalists for the National Cleanest City title. We are now seeing national recognition for Manchester as a bright, vibrant, thriving city. It’s a city which we all care about and of which we can all be justifiably proud. The Britain in Bloom competition gives everyone a chance to be part of the growing success.’

Councillor Richard Leese, Leader of Manchester City Council, said: ‘This is a great opportunity to concentrate on getting our city looking good. During the Commonwealth Games in 2002 there will be huge media attention focused on Manchester and the efforts which have gone into the creation of impressive floral contributions, keeping the city clean and the continuing regeneration of derelict buildings will all contribute to the image of the city which is projected to the rest of the world. I believe that Manchester’s entry, combining as it does a fantastic city with the energy, dedication and enthusiasm of its residents, stands an excellent chance of beating even those cities more usually  associated with this kind of award.’

As City Council teams prepare for the competition, 15,000 hanging baskets  and decorative tubs will go up in the City Centre and floral displays will be a prominent feature throughout the city. The team are looking at new ways of  displaying plants including topiary sculptures representing the sports featured in the 2002 Commonwealth Games. Two world records are being challenged,  with the construction of the longest ever flower bed and the ‘biggest flower in the world’, fashioned from a chimney.

Focusing on the importance of the cleanliness of the city to the success of the bid, Councillor Alan Spinks, Executive Member for the Environment, said: ‘We have made great strides in improving the cleanliness of Manchester’s streets. Operational Services work 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to keep the city clean, using methods ranging from large mechanical sweepers to smaller hand-controlled green machines. Our ‘grime busting’ initiative has Streetcare Rangers working alongside Ambassadorial Rangers, patrolling the City Centre, identifying and dealing with problems such as flyposting, graffiti and the need for repairs and repainting. ‘

Anyone interested in taking part can get information or advice on Tel: 0161 718 4800.
Media contact: Rebecca Kennedy / Roz Hughes, Press Office 0161 234 3332




CARDROOM CLEANS UP FOR URBAN IN BLOOM
20 April 2001    


Sunday 22nd April will see the residents of Cardroom Road, Ancoats getting together to clean up the streets, parks and gardens in the latest phase of their bid to scoop first prize in the Urban in Bloom competition.

As the judging date draws closer, pressure increases to bring about the transformation which organisers believe will bring them success in the competition. Local residents will take part in workshops, constructing their own window and porch boxes which will then be filled with flowers, bringing a splash of colour to the surrounding area. Teams will set to work, clearing the parks and streets of litter and rubbish, ready for the flower beds to be stocked with a vibrant array of plants and shrubs.

Councillor Martin Pagel, Deputy Leader of Manchester City Council, said: ‘This event shows how much can be achieved when people pool resources and work together towards a common goal. No member of the community needs to be left out. Volunteers will be around to help anyone who needs a hand with tidying up their garden. The emphasis is on team work. We’re seeing here today that if everyone pulls together, it is possible to bring about an amazing improvement in the local environment.’

The event is being organised by Manchester City Council’s Operational Services department and Manchester Environmental Resources Centre Initiative (MERCi), which opened its Centre for Sustainable Living on 6th April.

MERCi’s Helen Woodcock said: “Being involved in this kind of project gives people the chance to improve their local environment in a tangible and sustainable way. It’s great fun on the day, it brightens up the area and it gives the local community the confidence to know that they have the power to make a difference to the area in which they live.”


The day of activity will be rounded off with a barbeque, giving participants a chance to relax and enjoy the day’s achievements.

Media contact: Rebecca Kennedy / Roz Hughes: Press Office Tel: 0161 234 3332



URBAN IN BLOOM THE COMPETITION BEGINS
30th March 2001


On Friday 30th March at 1.30pm, the residents and school children of Miles Platting and Ancoats will be giving a dramatic start to their adventurous entry to the Urban In Bloom competition. The children, from St Mark’s School and Corpus Christie with St Anne’s in Miles Platting, will be helping to bring an instant splash of colour to the streets and open spaces.

This is the first in a series of events designed by the local community to brighten up the area in which they live and work. It will see the efforts of the energetic team channelled into filling beds and baskets with a stunning array of flowers in a project which will transform the appearance of the Ancoats and Miles Platting area.

The event has been organised by Helen Woodcock from the Manchester Environmental Resources Centre Initiative (MERCi), which is due to open its Centre for Sustainable Living on the 6th April.

Helen Woodcock from MERCi said: “The aim of today’s event is to find practical ways of encouraging more people living and working in the area to become involved in improving their local environment. The Urban In Bloom project will be used as a stepping stone to building community confidence and a sense of achievement.”

MERCi will be working with residents and community groups, schools, youth groups and local businesses, to put on environmental workshops, provide free or cheap materials (seeds, pots, tools etc), organise events, and generally help people to make their garden, street, or open space more attractive.

Major changes are already taking place. As well as introducing a splash of colour by establishing new flowerbeds and hanging baskets, resident groups  are discovering that a number of derelict sites which are currently a blight on the local community actually hold great potential and can make a positive contribution to the quality of the environment.

Councillor Martin Pagel, Deputy Leader of Manchester City Council, said: ‘The children here today are helping to create the sort of community and environment which they want to grow up in. They are the future of this community and are admirable their commitment and enthusiasm does them credit. I am sure they will take great pride in knowing that they were part of the team which brought about this transformation.’

If you would like to find out more about how you can make a difference to the environment in your area you can contact the Manchester in Bloom Team on  0161 718 4800.

 If you would like to find out more information about MERCi and their launch day, contact